020 7353 7884

clerks@templetax.com

Michael Sherry: Tax Journal article on 'Hely-Hutchinson: was HMRC merely unfair or ‘conspicuously unfair?'


22nd September 2017



How should HMRC treat taxpayers who are substantially in the same position but procedurally in different stages of resolving their affairs with HMRC, when it changes its mind about the correct view of the law? After Mansworth v Jelley in 2003, the Revenue’s web guidance allowed many claims for capital losses. Six years later, it changed its mind, even though some cases were still unresolved. HMRC applied the revised view of the law. Mr Hely-Hutchinson applied for judicial review, as he had been given a legitimate expectation as to how he would be dealt with. Although he could show no detrimental reliance, he claimed that to treat him differently from those already settled purely because of procedural reasons was ‘conspicuously unfair’. Whipple J agreed but the Court of Appeal disagrees. Should

not ‘fairness’ be an issue of substance?

 

To view this article, please click on the download below or go to https://goo.gl/KQNP7A


Download: pb54_MS_article.pdf

Associated Members

Michael Sherry

Chambers is consistently recognised as a Leading Tax Set in the Chambers and Partners and Legal 500 Directories

Our Members

Alun James
Michael Sherry
Jonathan S. Schwarz
Tim Brown
Scott Redpath
Michael Collins
Philip Ridgway
Stephen Arthur
Michael Quinlan
Keith M Gordon
Ximena Montes Manzano
Lyndsey Frawley
David Pett
Michael Avient
Denis Edwards

Our Clerks

Claire James
Senior Clerk
Lucy Campbell
Deputy Senior Clerk
Cindy Green
First Junior Clerk
Kaylin O'Rourke
Junior Clerk

Latest Publications

View All

David Pett

Jonathan S. Schwarz

David Pett

Ximena Montes Manzano

Anne Fairpo

David Pett

Keith M Gordon

Keith M Gordon

Ximena Montes Manzano
Keith M Gordon
Andrey Krahmal
Anne Fairpo

Alun James
Michael Collins

Philip Ridgway

Jonathan S. Schwarz

Get In Touch / Case Enquiry